I don’t care about your stance on
abortion; this is a tragedy:
"women who carried an unwanted pregnancy to term are three times more likely than women who receive an abortion to be below the poverty level two years later." (io9)
I couldn’t tell from this post whether the
women were below the poverty line before pregnancy, HOWEVER, no child should
have to grow up in poverty when I am sitting here never having struggled for
food or housing. No child gets to choose the family they are born into. I was
lucky.
People fight so hard for the right of
fetuses to grow to term and be born. But what happens after the baby is born?
They are launched into the world perhaps with an unemployed (and most likely
underemployed) mother. Hopefully there’s a father around. But if not? The
mother is stuck trying to support her baby financially as well as being a
mother and all the time that takes. She chose to get pregnant, now she has to
face the consequences.
People fight so hard for the right of
women to terminate pregnancies. But what happens after the baby is born? The
woman is expected to work and leave her precious child in a daycare or with a
grandparent or someone else. The mother is also expected to be a good mother
and take care of her baby. This leads to women working less than full time to
spend time with their children. She chose not to have an abortion, now she has
to face the consequences.
This is not okay. We can’t expect
women to be both providers and stay at home mothers. And the thing is, even if
there is a father around, a second income is needed to survive. The mother must be a provider, regardless of
whether the father is around. You know who suffers the most? The child, who, as
little choice as the parents had in their situation, had even less choice.
People talk about socialism like it’s
a bad word. I get it. You don’t want your hard earned earnings to be given to
some slacker. But think about the children. The parents may have made bad
choices, may not be ready to be parents, may not be financially stable enough
to be parents. But why, why should the baby ever have to suffer for it? But if
we’re going to force all women to carry their pregnancies to term, we need to
take care of the children. We live in a society. We should make it better for
everyone in this society, not just for ourselves.
Women do not want to raise a child in
poverty. It may not be government’s place to take care of the poor. But it is
the church’s place. If we want to stop abortions, we need to make it so women can
raise their children without the absolute, paralyzing, fear of having to raise
a child in poverty.
You have more common sense than any other christian I've ever met.
ReplyDeleteIt's refreshing to hear views and opinions from someone who actually thinks things through, rather than just rambling and basing their thoughts purely on emotion.
Some of the more zealous Christians I know would actually look down on you for thinking so much.
Thank you for your comment and your appreciation! I know exactly what you're talking about. That's why I always try to understand every side of an issue. When you try to understand people and not just force your own views, people are more likely to be friendly and conversational. Which just makes the world happier overall. Which seems to be the point of religion in general, don't you think?
Delete